Tag Archives: Writers Groups

Feel the Burn

Taking Our Novels From Second Rate, To Great!

For those of you who have frequented workout classes and gyms over the years, you have undoubtedly heard the expression feel the burn. You know what it means: feel the pain of a weak muscle growing more efficient through use, of your body becoming more honed and tight. Wouldn’t you like to do that for your WIP?

Allowing someone, especially another writer, to read your WIP can feel like exposing a newborn to the elements on a dark hillside. Yet it must be done.

We submit our chapters to beta-readers, writers groups, workshops, and writer friends. We take our beloved characters and plots and lay them at the feet of others. If we are very fortunate we know some good folks; some fellow writers who are willing and wise enough to help us.

If we’ve been doing this writing thing for a while we can by now distinguish the help that is truly needed, from the help that is just another writer’s opinion or prejudice. And that’s important. I don’t recommend taking everyone’s comments and using them. It’s your novel. You are the artist. Monet did not have somebody looking over his shoulder telling him not to use those greens and blues. (Or if he did, he knew enough not to listen.) We all have our own way we prefer a sentence to be structured, or punctuated, or a scene set. Those are suggestions to consider. They can sometimes be helpful, but…

There are the deeper, more weighty suggestions. Those that ask us to think about how a character is perceived by a reader. Those that question a plot twist, scene development, or pace. Those that highlight a sag in tension. These are the suggestions that set us to thinking and working on a weak slice of our novel, and if we stick with it, if we put in the effort, the result will be a leaner, more honed novel. One that will keep the reader licking her finger and turning the page.

I discovered a trick recently that I am going to share with you. It’s deceptively simple. But it helped me feel less overwhelmed by the whole rewriting process, because, like a weight machine in a gym helps us isolate a specific muscle, this little trick helps me isolate and focus in on one area, or solution, at a time. Here’s what I do:

  1. I copy and paste a section of the novel— where I’ve identified a weakness— into a blank document.  (Usually between 4000 – 6000 words.)
  2. I give the piece a name and save it.
  3. Then I give myself a question that addresses the weakness that has become apparent, or been pointed out to me, like, what would my MC be feeling here? Or, how can I describe this scene so it draws the reader in? Or, how can I get across the information the reader needs, without giving away the twist?
  4. I keep this flabby piece of the novel open on my computer for however long it takes to write it the best it can be. It can take hours, or days, but it doesn’t get put back into the novel until I know, with certainty, that it does what it is supposed to do, and does it well.
  5. Then I copy and paste it back into the main body of the novel, and move on to the next Area To Be Improved. (I don’t allow myself to think of these as ‘problem areas’, because problem areas tend to become problems. Just a little Jedi-mind-trick I play on myself.)

I think the reason this method works so well for me is that it makes each issue seem smaller and more manageable. Instead of feeling the psychological weight of every place that needs work in the novel, I focus in on only the one I’ve isolated. I usually write anything new in red. But using track changes will work too. I like to work new parts in red because when I’m done I can see at a glance how much, or little, had to be changed. Sometimes there’s just a smattering of red in a section I’ve finished. Other times there are entire paragraphs of red.

I know there are many ways to handle whipping a novel in shape. I’d love to hear about yours.

Do you have any tricks for getting through the last rewrites? How do you go about the big process of honing your novel?


The Cult of the Short Sentence

Over the course of having my work critiqued in local writers groups I have gotten back this remark numerous times: This sentence is too long. It takes up two and a half lines, and should be made into two or more sentences.

Where does this belief that all sentences should be short stem from? Is it the result of the shrinking American attention span? Of over-exposure to ‘sound bites’ and commercials and texting and tweeting? Is it instilled by the pallid preaching’s of exhausted high school English teachers, struggling to cram some semblance of education into the hormonally preoccupied, marginally literate minds of teens hopped up on Red Bull and Monster?

I have listened while writers tell other writers that their flawlessly crafted sentence should be chopped into shorter lengths – “because it is too long, you see.” (And these were not sentences dealing with action…just to clarify.)

At a recent writers’ group meeting a lovely young woman who might someday – if she diligently studies craft and reads a lot – become a writer, told the group, with unblinking sincerity and conviction (for her JC English teacher had said so), that any sentence over 10 or 12 words was suspect of being a ‘run-on’ sentence. After a stunned pause while those around the table absorbed this proclamation a discussion followed, with some writers claiming that most readers don’t have the patience or intelligence to read a novel containing long sentences.

With the exception of age appropriate genres like children’s and YA, (and perhaps pulp fiction and detective novels), I disagree.

And so today, my darlings, to both rebuke and refute this erroneous thinking, I am going to regal you with very long, very beautiful sentences—written by literary masters.

If you belong to the Cult of Short Sentences, gird yourself:

The world soon to be largely populated by men who would eat your children in front of your eyes and the cities themselves held by cores of blackened looters who tunneled among the ruins and crawled from the rubble white of tooth and eye carrying charred and anonymous tins of food in nylon nets like shoppers in the commissaries of hell.

And another:

The soft black talc blew through the streets like squid ink uncoiling along a sea floor and the cold crept down and the dark came early and the scavengers passing down the steep canyons with their torches trod silky holes in the drifted ash that closed behind them as silently as eyes.

From The Road, by Pulitzer prize winning author, Cormac McCarthy.

It looked like those farmhouses you ride by in the country in the middle of the afternoon, with the chickens under the trees and the dog asleep, and you know the only person in the house is the woman who has just finished washing up the dishes and has swept the kitchen and has gone upstairs to lie down for half an hour and has pulled off her dress and kicked off her shoes and is lying there on her back on the bed in the shadowy room with her eyes closed and a strand of her hair still matted down on her forehead with the perspiration.

And another:

I ate roast duck stuffed with oysters and yams and that wonderful curry they make in Savannah, which tastes good even to a man like me who loathes food, and drank rye whisky, and walked down those beautiful streets General Oglethorpe laid out, and stared at the beautiful houses, which were more severe than ever now, for the last leaves were off the arching trees of the streets and it was the season when the wind blows great chunks of gray sky in off the Atlantic which come dragging so low their bellies brush the masts and chimney pots, like gravid sows crossing a stubble field.

From All the King’s Men, by Pulitzer winning poet/author, Robert Penn Warren

“The Emperor Abul-Fath Jalaluddin Muhammad, king of kings, known since his childhood as Akbar, meaning ‘the Great,’ and latterly, in spite of the tautology of it, as Akbar the Great, the great great one, great in his greatness, doubly great, so great that the repetition in his title was not only appropriate, but necessary in order to express the gloriousness of his glory—The Grand Mughal, the dusty, battle-weary, victorious, pensive, incipiently overweight, disenchanted, mustachioed, poetic, oversexed, and absolute emperor, who seemed altogether too magnificent, too world-encompassing, and, in sum, too much to be a single human personage—this all-engulfing flood of a ruler, this swallower of worlds, this many-headed monster who referred to himself in the first person plural—had begun to meditate, during his long tedious journey home, on which he was accompanied by the heads of his defeated enemies bobbing in their sealed earthen pickle-jars, about the disturbing possibilities of the first person singular—the ‘I.’”

From The Enchantress of Florence  by Salman Rushdie  (contributed by writer, David Waid). In 2008, The Times ranked Rushdie thirteenth on their list of “The 50 greatest British writers since 1945″

It was a city in which the very old and the very new jostled each other, not uncomfortably, but without respect; a city of shops and offices and restaurants and homes, of parks and churches, of ignored monuments and remarkably unpalatial palaces; a city of hundreds of districts with strange names – Crouch End, Chalk Farms, Earl’s Court, Marble Arch – and oddly distinct identities; a noisy, cheerful, troubled city, which fed on tourists, needed them as it despised them, in which the average speed of transportation through the city had not increased in three hundred years, following five hundred years of fitful road-widening and unskillful compromises between the needs of traffic, whether horse-drawn, or more recently, motorized, and the needs of pedestrians; a city inhabited by and teeming with people of every manner and color and kind.

From Neverwhere by award winning author Neil Gaiman

“That something I cannot yet define completely but the feeling comes when you write well and truly of something and know impersonally you have written in that way and those who are paid to read it and report on it do not like the subject so they say it is all a fake, yet you know its value absolutely; or when you do something which people do not consider a serious occupation and yet you know truly, that it is as important and has always been as important as all the things that are in fashion, and when, on the sea, you are alone with it and know that this Gulf Stream you are living with, knowing, learning about, and loving, has moved, as it moves, since before man, and that it has gone by the shoreline of that long, beautiful, unhappy island since before Columbus sighted it and that the things you find out about it, and those that have always lived in it are permanent and of value because that stream will flow, as it has flowed, after the Indians, after the Spaniards, after the British, after the Americans and after all the Cubans and all the systems of governments, the richness, the poverty, the martyrdom, the sacrifice and the venality and the cruelty are all gone as the high-piled scow of garbage, bright-colored, white-flecked, ill-smelling, now tilted on its side, spills off its load into the blue water, turning it a pale green to a depth of four or five fathoms as the load spreads across the surface, the sinkable part going down and the flotsam of palm fronds, corks, bottles, and used electric light globes, seasoned with an occasional condom or a deep floating corset, the torn leaves of a student’s exercise book, a well-inflated dog, the occasional rat, the no-longer-distinguished cat; all this well shepherded by the boats of the garbage pickers who pluck their prizes with long poles, as interested, as intelligent, and as accurate as historians; they have the viewpoint; the stream, with no visible flow, takes five loads of this a day when things are going well in La Habana and in ten miles along the coast it is as clear and blue and unimpressed as it was ever before the tug hauled out the scow; and the palm fronds of our victories, the worn light bulbs of our discoveries and the empty condoms of our great loves float with no significance against one single, lasting thing—the stream.”

From The Green Hills of Africa by Pulitzer prize winning author, Ernest Hemingway  (Yes, this is all one sentence…all 424 words of it.)

Do you have a favorite long sentence? Do you know someone who fears them—for whom we might perform an intervention?


The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

The Bad

The truth about writers’ groups.

I’ve belonged to many writers groups over the years, in several different areas of the United States. So I feel I am in a unique position to understand what makes up a good one.

A good writers group offers camaraderie and an understanding ear (something our non-writing friends cannot) as well as free editing, mentoring, growth and advice.

Questions to ask yourself to determine if a group you are considering is the right one for you:

Are the other writers your target audience? Do the others in the group read your genre?

If they don’t, you are likely to get many critiques asking what words mean, and correcting terms, word count and phrases that are common in the genre of your novel, but unfamiliar to those in the group. Not only is this time consuming and generally unhelpful in any practical sense, but it can actually damage your novel. Yes, I did say damage. If you are unsure of your skills you may concede to this pressure and end up leaching all the color and vitality out of your manuscript.

If you choose to participate in a group that reads mainly vampire novels and sci-fi, for instance, you are likely to run into problems with comprehension if you write say, romance, or literary.

Another question to ask yourself is:

Are the folks in your group writing at the same level as yourself?

If they are writing at a level much above yours and they are kind and mentoring folks, good for you! You’ve found a good group! Stay and glean all you can from these kind and giving people.

If, however, they are much more skillful than yourself (or even just think they are), but unkind and egotistical, then you are in for a hellish experience. One of the very first groups I belonged to as a young writer in Virginia was this sort. I always left feeling, not inspired, but depressed and anxious, and as if I would never attain the level of the other writers.

At the very least you will come away from a meeting like this with a feeling that your writing is worthless. Again, this can actually do damage, not only to your manuscript, but to your nascent view of yourself as a writer.

A final question you might ask is: are the others in the group serious writers?

By this I mean: do they write every day, or do they just doodle a bit when the feeling comes over them; when they feel inspired. There’s nothing wrong with this, by the way, but if you are serious about taking your writing all the way to a career, these hobbyists won’t be of any help to you.

Okay, that’s the Bad.

Now for the Ugly…yes, it can be even worse!

Ahhh…the uglies. If you’ve been in many writers’ groups you have undoubtedly encountered them. They come in many guises. But let me tell you about two of the most toxic I have encountered.

First there’s the Monolog-ist. This guy loves to hear himself talk. And talk. And TALK. He will monopolize the meeting (the meeting you’ve been looking forward to for days) to the point where folks begin looking at each other around the table to see if it’s only them, or if this guy really has been talking for 10 solid minutes. About his wife, or his job, or his political leanings, or his car, his house, his sex life, his dog, his shoelaces. Until you want to scream, “Dude, SHUT UP!

But that wouldn’t be nice.

So, you sit patiently and wait for him to wind down. You examine your fingernails, plan your grocery shopping list…waste your precious Saturday afternoon.

Another ugly that haunts some meetings is The Expert. The Expert knows more about your topic than you do. He will cite pseudo facts and give Wiki-links to back them up. If you dispute them he will challenge you to email him with your links after the meeting. The others around the table will listen and assume The Expert knows what he’s talking about…he certainly seems to. The Expert has a little of the Monolog-ist in him—because he will dispute your facts at length. For the first few meetings you may not mind this too much. After all, this guy really seems to want to help. But after going home to redo your research each time this occurs you soon discover The Expert is not really as knowledgeable as he pretends to be. Your research is solid, your facts irrefutable.

The Ugly

So, you rise to his challenge at the next meeting and politely suggest he stop checking your facts. The meeting degenerates into a brawl. No solid critiquing of your work or anybody else’s gets done. The Expert is quiet for a meeting or two, presumably chastened. But then one evening it’s His turn to give His opinion…and you see that maniacal gleam in his eye.

Even if you like the other writers in these groups, STOP GOING! If the group’s leader or the other writers do not rise up and control a tyrant, the group will just be a drain on your time, toxic to your life, and your work. Stop attending and look for another group. You’ll be so happy you did.

And now, at last, the Good  (always nice to leave on a positive note).

Good writers groups are out there. A good writers group has a leader(s) that directs the meetings and keeps them on track if they begin to stray. In a good group writers check their egos at the door on the way in. They are well-read, well-mannered and come from a wide range of life experiences. If they have something to say that might be hard to hear, they say it kindly. A good group is one where the writers respect each other.

Sound too good to be true? Well, it’s not. I have belonged to several. I belong to one now.

If you know what you’re looking for you’ll be able to find it. And if you can’t? Well then, Creative One, why not create your own group? Cruise the established groups in your area and find some good writers. Get to know them. The internet provides any number of venues to advertise and attract the sort of people you want to your group. One such venue is Meetup.com. Think about what you want the atmosphere of your group to be. What is the ideal you have in mind? Then set about making it happen.

The Good

Happy writing!

What are some of your writers group experiences? What advice would you give to a writer looking for a group?


Book Fest, Back by Popular Request

In response to requests for a little more about the Tucson Festival of Books I got out my notebook and will give you a few of the tidbits I gleaned.

Literary agents Amy Rennert and Claire Gerus had many suggestions for new writers. Both thought following Publishers Marketplace and Publishers Lunch were good sources to keep in the loop about what is being published.

A social media marketing workshop proved to be interesting. Although I don’t subscribe to the idea of automating tweets, as the workshop leader suggested we do. (Personally I am not interested in reading automated tweeps, so why should I send them out to others?) I use Twitter to build relationships with folks. I want to actually know about those I interact with on Twitter. I’ve found support there, and opportunity to give my support to others.  If you haven’t tried it, perhaps you should?

During a workshop for sagging middles – don’t look down at your waist, we’re still talking writing here – I learned that getting through a tough middle on a novel can simply be a matter of asking, “What is the next indicated thing a character would do? Then possibly asking, “ What is the last thing she would do?” Also, “What would make my character suffer the most?” (Always my favorite, brwhahaha.)

I attended the festival with workshop writer friends: Char Bishop, Diana Douglas, LaDonna (yes…just LaDonna, you know, like Cher, or Prince) Janice Russell, Patricia Cox, David Waid and John Blohm. All fantastic writers, and wonderfully supportive of each other. (Members of the ANWW.)

Writers of the ANWW and friends

Trish arranged for us to get together with some other writer friends Saturday evening at The Blue Willow. We ate outside on the patio. It was the perfect way to cap off the first day of the festival. The ladies later retired to one of our rooms at the Marriot, where we drank wine and talked about the high points of our day.

(It would take not one, but two, strong lattes at the funky hookah bar near campus to get me going the next morning.)

I’m marking my calendar for next March and definitely plan on attending. And if you plan on being anywhere near Arizona next year in March, you should too!

The Tucson Festival of Books – highly recommended.


Are You a Writer?

The question came up at the Arizona Novel Writers Workshop:  How do you know if you’re a writer? It was asked by Liz – an excellent writer of the murder mystery persuasion.

The question, and the various replies to it, got my brain perking.

How do you know you’re a writer? When can that label be legitimately claimed for one’s self?

For me, I think  I first thought of myself as a writer when I was in college, taking a creative writing course. I completed my first story, beginning to end. It was terrible. Something about a woman being sexually harassed by her boss, who was a florist. As I write this I can actually feel my shoulders hunch a little, remembering how bad that story was, and that I proudly showed it to my classmates and professor. At the time I thought it was so ‘true to life’. My next completed story was a pretentious little piece of tripe about some rich kids whose hobnobbing, partying parents neglected them, which of course ended in tragedy. Very subtle literary tragedy, I was certain - I was going through my F. Scott Fitzgerald phase just then.

But irregardless of how rotten my skills were, how faulty the execution was, and the naiveté of my young human perceptions, one thing was certain: I liked writing. I liked it a lot.

And as a result I started seeing myself as a writer. Which seems to have worked, because I have since become one.  Perhaps the metaphysicians are correct and being a writer (a butcher, a baker, a candlestick maker) is linked to first imagining yourself as one.

So, in response to Liz’s question, I have compiled this list of ways to ‘tell’ if you are a writer, or not.

  • You often wake during the night with an idea that makes you get out of bed and write it down.
  • You sometimes shout out the obvious (to you) next plot development during movies, resulting in your family and friends irritably shushing you for ‘giving away the ending’.
  • You have an uncommon (perhaps even unseemly) fondness for books.
  • The weird people you meet fascinate you as possible characters in your next novel or short story.
  • If you suddenly found yourself without fingers, you’d find a way to type with your toes.
  • You eves drop on conversations you’re not part of.  And then mentally edit them.
  • You spend more on paper, notebooks, pens and printer ink then you do on shoes. (This sign is an especially good indicator if you are female, or a drag queen.)
  • You become truculent when you don’t have time to write.
  • You know what truculent means.
  • It’s 4pm, you’ve been working all day, you’re still in your pajamas, and the dog has made a puddle in the kitchen because you neglected to let her out.
  • You continue to write, despite those depressing blogs and articles saying how slim your chances are of getting published or finding an agent.
  • You’re not afraid of the voices in your head. You like them.
  • You have at least as many conversations with imaginary folks as ‘real’ ones. You don’t totally buy the distinction.
  • You know you ate, the empty plate on your desk is evidence, but you can’t remember doing it or what it was.
  • You enjoy nothing better than torturing the heroine/hero.
  • You’ve gleefully told a friend that you killed someone that morning/day/evening . . . and that you enjoyed it. 

What are your thoughts? If you write, when did you first begin to think of yourself as ‘a writer’?

 


Tucson Festival of Books

The schedule of events came out this past week for the Tucson Festival of Books. I am busy perusing it and planning my  two days there with the writers of the Arizona Novel Writers Workshop .

The very first order of the day for me, of course, was to locate those events featuring Arizona-based writer  Diana Gabaldon, since hearing her speak (squeee!!!) is one of the main reasons I’ll be attending.

Read  up on advice on attending conferences this morning. Will take into serious consideration points concerning not breathing on an agent’s (or a certain favorite author’s) neck from behind (with or without breath mints), or following said agent or favorite author to the ladies room and then lurking outside. (Also promise not to shove my manuscript under the stall door).

Here’s what the Arizona Star has to say about the Book Festival.

The festival is scheduled to take place over the weekend of the 12th and 13th of March.

Hope to see you there!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,719 other followers

%d bloggers like this: